t1k:problem-solve

Auto-generated

🔒 Auto-generated from The1Studio/[email protected] — edit the source kit, not this page.

Field	Value
Module	t1k-extended
Version	2.14.3
Effort	medium
Tools	—

Keywords: blocked, breakthrough, complexity, spiral, stuck, systematic, unblock

How to invoke

/t1k:problem-solve
[problem description]

---

Problem-Solving Techniques

Systematic approaches for different types of stuck-ness. Each technique targets specific problem patterns.

Auto-activation: Triggered by T1K error recovery when /t1k:debug or /t1k:fix fails 3+ times on the same issue. See skills/t1k-fix/references/error-recovery.md.

MCP integration: If mcp__sequential-thinking__sequentialthinking is available, use it for structured step-by-step analysis within each technique. Fall back to pure markdown methodology if MCP not connected.

When to Use

Apply when encountering:

• Complexity spiraling — multiple implementations, growing special cases, excessive branching
• Innovation blocks — conventional solutions inadequate, need breakthrough thinking
• Recurring patterns — same issue across domains/modules, reinventing solutions
• Assumption constraints — forced into “only way”, can’t question premise
• Scale uncertainty — production readiness unclear, edge cases unknown
• General stuck-ness — unsure which technique applies

Quick Dispatch

Match symptom to technique:

Stuck Symptom	Technique	Reference
Same thing implemented 5+ ways, growing special cases	Simplification Cascades	references/simplification-cascades.md
Conventional solutions inadequate, need breakthrough	Collision-Zone Thinking	references/collision-zone-thinking.md
Same issue in different modules, reinventing wheels	Meta-Pattern Recognition	references/meta-pattern-recognition.md
Solution feels forced, “must be done this way”	Inversion Exercise	references/inversion-exercise.md
Will this work at production? Edge cases unclear?	Scale Game	references/scale-game.md
Unsure which technique to use	When Stuck	references/when-stuck.md

Core Techniques

1. Simplification Cascades

Find one insight eliminating multiple components. “If this is true, we don’t need X, Y, Z.”

Key insight: Everything is a special case of one general pattern. Red flag: “Just need to add one more case…” (repeating forever)

2. Collision-Zone Thinking

Force unrelated concepts together to discover emergent properties. “What if we treated X like Y?”

Key insight: Revolutionary ideas from deliberate metaphor-mixing. Red flag: “I’ve tried everything in this domain”

3. Meta-Pattern Recognition

Spot patterns appearing in 3+ domains/modules to find universal principles.

Key insight: Patterns in how patterns emerge reveal reusable abstractions. Red flag: “This problem is unique” (probably not)

T1K note: Cross-module patterns are common — if 3+ modules have the same workaround, extract to a shared skill or core rule.

4. Inversion Exercise

Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints. “What if the opposite were true?”

Key insight: Valid inversions reveal context-dependence of “rules.” Red flag: “There’s only one way to do this”

5. Scale Game

Test at extremes (1000x bigger/smaller, instant/year-long) to expose fundamental truths.

Key insight: What works at one scale fails at another. Red flag: “Should scale fine” (without testing)

Application Process

1. Identify stuck-type — match symptom to technique above
2. Check module scope — which module owns the stuck task? Load its skills for domain context
3. Load detailed reference — read specific technique from references/
4. Apply systematically — follow technique’s process (use MCP sequential-thinking if available)
5. Document insights — record what worked/failed in plans/reports/
6. Combine if needed — some problems need multiple techniques

Combining Techniques

Powerful combinations:

• Simplification + Meta-pattern — find pattern, then simplify all instances
• Collision + Inversion — force metaphor, then invert its assumptions
• Scale + Simplification — extremes reveal what to eliminate
• Meta-pattern + Scale — universal patterns tested at extremes

T1K Integration

Auto-Activation (Error Recovery)

When /t1k:debug or /t1k:fix fails 3+ times:

1. Error recovery rule auto-suggests this skill
2. Classify the stuck-type from error patterns
3. Apply matching technique
4. If technique succeeds — resume /t1k:fix with new approach
5. If still stuck — escalate to user with technique analysis

Module-Scoped Analysis

When analyzing a stuck problem:

1. Identify which module(s) are involved
2. Read module’s skills for domain-specific patterns
3. Check if the pattern exists in other modules (meta-pattern)
4. Check if the issue is at a module boundary (ownership conflict)

References

Load detailed guides as needed:

• references/when-stuck.md — dispatch flowchart and decision tree
• references/simplification-cascades.md — cascade detection and extraction
• references/collision-zone-thinking.md — metaphor collision process
• references/meta-pattern-recognition.md — pattern abstraction techniques
• references/inversion-exercise.md — assumption flipping methodology
• references/scale-game.md — extreme testing procedures