t1k:plan

Auto-generated

🔒 Auto-generated from The1Studio/[email protected] — edit the source kit, not this page.

Field	Value
Module	t1k-base
Version	2.17.3
Effort	high
Tools	Agent, AskUserQuestion, Bash, Edit, Glob, Grep, MultiEdit, Read, Task, TodoWrite, WebFetch, WebSearch, Write

Keywords: approach, architecture, breakdown, design, phases, plan, roadmap

How to invoke

/t1k:plan
[task] OR archive|red-team|validate [--auto|--fast|--hard|--deep|--parallel|--two|--tdd|--team] [--team-devs N|--team-reviewers N|--team-researchers N|--team-debuggers N]

---

TheOneKit Plan — Implementation Planning

Create phased implementation plans. Routes to registered t1k-planner agent via routing protocol.

Pre-flight Step 0 — Fuzzy plan/path arg resolution (MANDATORY)

If the user’s arg is not an exact existing path (e.g. resume an existing plan by partial name like chaosforge-demo, or reference phase-3, or empty / “active plan” for resume), run the Fuzzy Plan / Path Resolution Protocol at skills/t1k-cook/references/fuzzy-plan-resolution.md BEFORE bail.

Skill MUST NOT emit “no plan matching” until the protocol has been applied and its Step 6 reached.

Tool guard — AskUserQuestion availability

AskUserQuestion is always available, but in long-context sessions it may be deferred (name appears in the deferred-tools system-reminder; schema is NOT loaded).

Decision tree before drafting any multi-option question:

1. Tool schema visible in the loaded tool list? → call AskUserQuestion directly. No ToolSearch needed.
2. Only the NAME appears in the deferred-tools reminder? → run ToolSearch(query="select:AskUserQuestion", max_results=1), THEN call the tool.
3. Neither? → this is a session-config error. STOP and report it to the user. Do NOT proceed with prose questions.

Forbidden output — anti-hallucination clause (MANDATORY)

The plan output MUST NEVER contain phrases like:

• “AskUserQuestion is unavailable in this thread”
• “the tool is unavailable, so defaults are listed inline”
• “I would normally batch into AskUserQuestion, but…”
• “the tool was not loaded, defaulting to prose”

These phrases are a hallucination + violation. The tool is available — if its schema isn’t in your inventory, that is a signal to run ToolSearch, not to fall back to prose. If you catch yourself drafting any of these phrases, STOP, emit a [t1k:skill-bug] marker for this skill, and restart the question-asking step.

Failure mode this guard prevents

Assistant remembers the rule, drafts the question correctly in its head, then because the tool schema isn’t in the loaded inventory, rationalises “unavailable in this thread → I’ll write prose.” Drafting prose bullets first is a violation — see rules/always-ask-on-unresolved.md “Forbidden prose” table. Especially relevant in plan endgame: “Open questions before I write the plan” lists are the canonical violation pattern.

When to Use

• Planning new features
• Architecting system designs
• Breaking down complex requirements
• Creating roadmaps with testing/review gates

Workflow Modes

Flag	Research	Red Team	Validation	Cook Handoff
--auto	Auto-detect	Follows mode	Follows mode	/t1k:cook
--fast	Skip	Skip	Skip	/t1k:cook --auto
--hard	2 researchers	Yes	Optional	—
--deep	3 researchers	Yes	Mandatory	—
--parallel	2 researchers	Yes	Optional	/t1k:cook --parallel
--tdd	Composable with any mode	—	—	Annotates phase cards with 3.T/3.I/3.V sub-steps
--team	Composable with any mode	—	—	Emits explicit teammate roster per phase; cook handoff → /t1k:team cook

Mode comparison, --deep vs --hard, and --team details: references/workflow-modes.md. Team-shape output contract (sections, defaults, model-per-teammate per issue #268): references/team-shape-template.md.

Guards

• --hard + --deep: REFUSE. --deep is a strict superset of --hard; use one or the other.
• --fast + --deep: REFUSE. Fast mode skips rigor; --deep mandates it. They are incompatible.
• --tdd + --parallel: REFUSE. TDD requires strict T→I→V ordering; parallel execution cannot preserve it.
• --fast + --hard: ALLOWED but discouraged — document the reason in the plan.
• --team sub-flags (--team-devs, --team-reviewers, --team-researchers, --team-debuggers): IGNORED unless --team is also present. Warn the user if any sub-flag is set without --team.

Subcommands

Subcommand	Purpose
/t1k:plan archive	Archive plans + journal
/t1k:plan red-team	Adversarial plan review
/t1k:plan validate	Critical questions interview

Context Reminder

After plan creation, output the cook handoff line:

• Default: /t1k:cook {plan-path} (single-agent execution).
• When --team was set: /t1k:team cook {plan-path} (multi-teammate execution honoring the team-shape sections). NEVER suggest /t1k:cook for a --team plan — single-agent execution ignores the team-shape and silently downgrades the parallelism the plan was built around.

Open Questions Gate (MANDATORY)

If the t1k-planner needs to confirm 2-4 design decisions before finalizing the plan (e.g., “scope target A or B?”, “use module X or Y?”, “tier thresholds?”), the t1k-planner MUST invoke AskUserQuestion (batch up to 4 per call). NEVER list open questions as numbered prose with checkbox-style alternatives, default tables, or “override before /t1k:cook” tables — these are all violations regardless of the disclaimer wrapping them. This applies at every step where decisions remain — not just the final cook handoff.

Self-check before writing the plan file: scan your draft for any section matching D[0-9]+ | Decision | Default | Alternatives or ## Open Design Decisions headers. If found, your plan was written by the failure mode — delete the section, invoke AskUserQuestion for those items, and rewrite the section as resolved decisions (no “default” / “alternative” columns).

See rules/ask-before-deciding.md → “Failure mode — post-design open questions” for the exact pattern to avoid.

Agent Routing

Follow protocol: skills/t1k-cook/references/routing-protocol.md This command uses role: t1k-planner

Multi-round plan-review fan-out (named-agent routing)

When --deep, --hard, /t1k:plan validate, or /t1k:plan red-team triggers multi-round review, each round MUST spawn an explicitly-named specialist agent. general-purpose is NEVER acceptable here — it erases the quality/cost intent of the round.

Round	Focus	Canonical agent	Default model
1 — Rigor	Completeness, edge-case coverage, assumption audit	t1k-planner	opus
2 — Technical	Implementation feasibility, tech-debt risk, skill-body tightness	t1k-code-reviewer	sonnet
3 — Facts	Reference accuracy, link validity, claim verification	t1k-researcher	sonnet
4 — Adversarial	Attack vectors, anti-patterns, pessimistic stress-test	t1k-planner (red-team brief)	opus

Spawn contract: each round agent receives the prior round’s output + the original plan as Fork Context Brief (skills/t1k-resolve-context/references/fcb-protocol.md). The assembling agent (final round or integration step) synthesizes conflicts; it does not re-run the rounds.

Skill Inventory Injection (if installedModules present in metadata.json)

Before spawning t1k-planner agent:

1. Read .claude/metadata.json → installedModules (v3) or modules (v2 fallback)
2. Read ALL t1k-activation-*.json → collect skill names grouped by module
3. Inject into t1k-planner prompt as inventory (names + modules, NOT full activation): “Available skills by module:
   • {module} v{version} (kit: {kit}): {skill1}, {skill2}… You can READ skill files if needed. DO NOT activate skills — planning only.”

Team-Shape Planning (--team flag)

When the user passes --team, the planner MUST emit two team-shape sections in the generated plan:

1. Upfront ## Team Layout in plan.md — cross-phase roster summary table (phase → teammates → roles → worktrees → parallel cap).
2. Per-phase ### Team Shape in each phase-N.md — concrete spawn-ready roster: agent type, explicit model: field, module scope, ownership globs, worktree flag, spawn order, and skills each teammate should activate first.

The planner MUST also emit a tail ## Plan-Fit Assessment (--team) section consumed by the lead at /t1k:team cook time.

Full output contract (sections, defaults, model-per-teammate rationale, sub-flag interaction, composability with --deep/--hard/--tdd, worked example): references/team-shape-template.md.

Why --team is a plan deliverable, not a runtime decision: the Claude Code harness hard-strips the Agent tool at fork depth ≥ 1. Teammates spawned by /t1k:team (depth 1) cannot spawn further sub-agents — they can only invoke the Skill tool. So the cast must be fixed before the lead calls TeamCreate. Spec: skills/t1k-team/references/fork-context-bail.md.

Model per teammate (issue #268): each roster entry MUST carry an explicit model: value (default sonnet). Without it, the lead inherits the parent’s model — and if the parent is Opus, every “default” teammate silently runs at ~5x cost. The --team output contract enforces named models.

Multi-Agent Planning Pipeline (if 2+ modules matched)

Auto-detect: count distinct modules with keyword matches.

• 0-1 modules → single t1k-planner (standard)
• 2+ modules → multi-agent pipeline:

Phase A — Domain Design (if designer kit installed): spawn designer agent Phase B — Domain Planning (PARALLEL): one t1k-planner per matched module Phase C — Integration (sequential): generic t1k-planner assembles domain plans

Execution Trace (if features.executionTrace enabled)

After task completes, output compact planning trace:

• Modules matched, pipeline mode (single/multi)
• Skills inventory provided (count across modules)
• Fallbacks, warnings

Risk Assessment (Mandatory Output)

Every plan phase must include a risk table and effort estimate:

### Risk Assessment
| Risk | Likelihood (1-5) | Impact (1-5) | Score | Mitigation |
|------|-----------------|--------------|-------|------------|
| {risk} | {L} | {I} | {L*I} | {action} |

### Timeline
| Phase | Effort | Notes |
|-------|--------|-------|
| Phase 1: {name} | S (1d) / M (3d) / L (1wk) | {blocker or dep} |
| Total | {sum} | Critical path: {phase list} |

Effort scale: S = ~1 day, M = ~3 days, L = ~1 week. Use judgment, not false precision. Risk score >= 15 = high risk, mandate mitigation before phase starts.

Architecture References

For self-assembling kit architecture (Pillars 1–4: SSOT spec files, schema versioning + auto-migrate, declarative CI gates, lifecycle hub) and the canonical phasing model that produced the safety-addendum plan, see plans/reports/260422-1248-self-assembling-kit-architecture.md. Plan authors working on TheOneKit infrastructure should align new phases with the §3 Seven Pillars and §11 Consumer Impact & Rollout sequence.

Sub-Agent Fork Hygiene

Sub-agent forking: see skills/t1k-architecture/references/fork-hygiene.md.